Front forks and geometry

discussions specific to the 907IE
Post Reply
User avatar
romus
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:06 pm
model: 906 Paso
year: 1990
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Front forks and geometry

Post by romus »

Could anyone provide some measurements related to the 907ie forks.

I have put 907ie swingarm on a 906 as well as tryign to keep 16" front wheel with higher profile trye. I am questioning how much I dropped/lengthenned the 906 forks - don't want speed wobble! I want to match the 907ie balance.

Would be helpful to have these measurements, which I cannot find in the manuals:
1. distance from bottom of handle bar tripple tree to centre of front axle.
2. distance from centre of front axle to ground
3. distance form centre of rear axle to ground
4. any rake angle info different than 906 if you know it. I think 907 is the same frame as 906, so in my thinking if I get 1-3 same measurements are the 907ie then it will be good.

Thanks a lot for any help.
Warwick - on a learning curve and on a
Ducati Paso - Soul of a thoroughbred :P
User avatar
ducbertus
paso grand pooh-bah
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:00 am
model: 907 I.E.
year: 1991
Location: holland

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by ducbertus »

Hi Romus,

I found the next measurements on my 907.
1) centre front axle- underside topclamp ± 780 mm
2) centre front axle - ground ± 288 depending on tire pressure, tire load, wear of the tire.
3) centre rear axle - ground ± 305 depending on ... etc., etc.
4) I'm not sure, but I think the angle rake is the same.

If necessary you can make longer nuts on the top of the tubes, like in the old Honda MT time.
Ducbertus
User avatar
ducbertus
paso grand pooh-bah
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:00 am
model: 907 I.E.
year: 1991
Location: holland

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by ducbertus »

Hi Romus,

I found the next measurements on my 907.
1) centre front axle- underside topclamp ± 780 mm
2) centre front axle - ground ± 288 depending on tire pressure, tire load, wear of the tire.
3) centre rear axle - ground ± 305 depending on ... etc., etc.
4) I'm not sure, but I think the angle rake is the same.

If necessary you can make longer nuts on the top of the tubes, like in the old Honda MT time.
Ducbertus
User avatar
romus
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:06 pm
model: 906 Paso
year: 1990
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by romus »

ducbertus wrote: 1) centre front axle- underside topclamp ± 780 mm
Ducbertus
Can I double check our langauge. I meant from centre axle to where the fork enters the top clamp from the bottom side. Is that what you understood?
Warwick - on a learning curve and on a
Ducati Paso - Soul of a thoroughbred :P
User avatar
ducbertus
paso grand pooh-bah
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:00 am
model: 907 I.E.
year: 1991
Location: holland

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by ducbertus »

Yes, because I couldn't measure the total lenght of the legs accurately. the handlebars, covering the top of the leg prevents that
so, the underside of the upper triple clamp was the easiest for me.

Ducbertus
User avatar
romus
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:06 pm
model: 906 Paso
year: 1990
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by romus »

ducbertus wrote:Yes, because I couldn't measure the total lenght of the legs accurately. the handlebars, covering the top of the leg prevents that so, the underside of the upper triple clamp was the easiest for me.

Ducbertus
Hmm would mean 907ie front forks 40mm longer than the 906 forks, but it is still not such a good measurement because it would depend on spring and oil in forks. Others below sure difference is 10mm.
Last edited by romus on Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Warwick - on a learning curve and on a
Ducati Paso - Soul of a thoroughbred :P
lofty 36
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:28 am
model: 907 I.E.
year: 1991
Location: New Zealand

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by lofty 36 »

Hi There

I have a 906 and 907 and the 907 forks are 10mm longer

Hope that helps not home for around a week but i'm happy to give you the mesurments on my return

Cheers Peter
biffo
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:27 am
model: 907 I.E.
year: 1991

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by biffo »

hi romus as said before the 907 has 10mm longer forks i have a 906 which i converted 6 years ago to inch rear with 907 swing arm no probs has still 16 front very stable she is out to 944 and injected running a power commander best way to go best of luck Tim ps have a 907 not as stable
User avatar
romus
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:06 pm
model: 906 Paso
year: 1990
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by romus »

biffo wrote:hi romus as said before the 907 has 10mm longer forks i have a 906 which i converted 6 years ago to inch rear with 907 swing arm no probs has still 16 front very stable she is out to 944 and injected running a power commander best way to go best of luck Tim ps have a 907 not as stable
When you converted to 907 swingarm did you also drop your forks? So far I dropped mine 8mm. My maths would say I could do another 8mm since, but maybe its not a perfect science and my balance now might be just right. Certainly feels far far better on corners. Maybe a bit too sensitive steering coming up to the lights to stop - how's yours?
Warwick - on a learning curve and on a
Ducati Paso - Soul of a thoroughbred :P
User avatar
paso750
paso grand pooh-bah
Posts: 5568
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 12:00 am
model: 750 Paso
year: 1987
Location: southern Germany

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by paso750 »

do 906 and 907ie shock have the identical length ?! Just wondering.
biffo
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:27 am
model: 907 I.E.
year: 1991

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by biffo »

romus wrote:
biffo wrote:hi romus as said before the 907 has 10mm longer forks i have a 906 which i converted 6 years ago to inch rear with 907 swing arm no probs has still 16 front very stable she is out to 944 and injected running a power commander best way to go best of luck Tim ps have a 907 not as stable
When you converted to 907 swingarm did you also drop your forks? So far I dropped mine 8mm. My maths would say I could do another 8mm since, but maybe its not a perfect science and my balance now might be just right. Certainly feels far far better on corners. Maybe a bit too sensitive steering coming up to the lights to stop - how's yours?
hi romus as i fitted a higher profile front tyre i left the forks alone and its been ok
User avatar
ducbertus
paso grand pooh-bah
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 12:00 am
model: 907 I.E.
year: 1991
Location: holland

Re: Front forks and geometry

Post by ducbertus »

Hi Paso 750,

yes, as far as I know these are the same.

ducbertus
Post Reply